The emoji grid wasn't rendering on Android because emoji-picker-element
defaults to fetching its data.json from jsdelivr, and CapacitorHttp's
patched fetch breaks the library's ETag-based revalidation flow. Bundle
emoji-picker-element-data via Vite's ?url import so the JSON ships as a
same-origin asset.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
#135
This PR adds basic video functionality to our voice rooms. Again I followed the Discord UX for inspiration, so all video calls start as voice-only calls that gracefully upgrade (and downgrade) when someone turns on a video or starts screen sharing.
When a video feed is detected the Room page will change to display a grid of feeds. The grid logic is very basic, that's definitely an area to improve in the future. You can open the chat part of the room with a new button on the VoiceWidget - on the desktop layout this creates a split view with video on the left and chat on the right, but on mobile it switches to chat fullscreen. I also added a little pin icon you can use to focus on a single video feed (useful for screen sharing). There is a lot of tailwind I don't understand here, but it seems to work well enough.
I moved voice.ts into a new `call` folder and moved some of its stores into `call/stores.ts` which allowed me to keep most of the video logic in `call/video.ts`. It's not a perfect encapsulation as voice.ts does subscribe to some of the hooks for the livekit calls and passes some of the signals onto `video.ts`. This could probably be broken up better but for this PR I'd rather not focus on making it perfect if that's ok. Partly for the sake of time but also because I envision another PR that renames/reorganizes things and I think a larger UX evaluation is necessary and should include real user feedback. I'm not confident tha""t the Voice Room concept as a whole will stick going forward. Maybe all rooms in a livekit enabled server should be able to host a call (like a slack huddle), maybe users want to be able to schedule calls as events, or even have them start with an ad-hoc set of participants completely outside of a NIP-29 group, etc.
Co-authored-by: mplorentz <mplorentz@noreply.gitea.coracle.social>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.coracle.social/coracle/flotilla/pulls/135
Co-authored-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
Co-committed-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
